Construction serious accident prevention:
prove every hazard through to closure.
On construction sites, hazard signals arrive through different routes — a subcontractor’s photo, a CCTV AI detection, a gas alarm, a permit-to-work finding. The signals differ; the path to closure should be one.
Site scenes are AI-generated; product screens are the actual COREON Safety AX recorded with virtual data in a demo environment. Korean narration. Watch on YouTube →
Housing · Building
Fall-hazard reports at slab edges, entry detection in steel lifting zones.
Civil
Gas alarms in tunnels and confined spaces, with readings and threshold breaches.
Plant
Hot-work and gas permit conditions not met, plus gas detection alarms.
Power
Missed de-energization or LOTO checks, and recurrence prevention.
Scope boundary
CCTV and sensor signals remain review candidates until a person confirms them and are never grounds for automatic closure. External integration is applied after interface validation at the customer site. The demo video is narrated in Korean.
One execution flow
FAQ
How do you prevent missed actions across many subcontractors?
Every hazard signal becomes an event with an owner and a deadline, and the server blocks closure until evidence, residual risk reassessment and approval are in place.
Do we have to replace our existing safety platform?
No. COREON can be applied as a complementary layer that connects execution, evidence and closure after a hazard is found.
Related searches
construction safety management · serious accident prevention · subcontractor safety · fall hazard · confined space gas · permit to work · LOTO · TBM
This page and video describe the execution and evidence scope of the product; they do not guarantee legal compliance or certification. Judging fulfilment of legal duties remains the workplace’s responsibility. Site scenes are AI-generated, product screens use virtual data in a demo environment, and nothing here implies integration with or endorsement by any customer or manufacturer.